According to the material, what effect does sports as an institution have on gender power?

According to the material, what effect does sports as an institution have on gender power?

• A. It reinforces heterosexual male power
• B. It eliminates all gender disparities
• C. It has no impact on power dynamics
• D. It promotes matriarchal structures

Answer: (A)

The main idea here is how sport as an institution shapes who holds power and in what way. The material shows that sport tends to reinforce heterosexual male power. This shows up in leadership and governance being dominated by men, the way media coverage and sponsorship priorities spotlight male athletes and masculine stories, and the cultural norms within sport that value toughness, competitiveness, and heterosexualized masculinity. Those patterns keep power concentrated with men and align with heterosexual norms, rather than leveling gender inequalities or shifting toward matriarchal structures. So, it isn’t that sport eliminates disparities, has no impact, or promotes a matriarchal system—the patterns described point to reinforcing male-heterosexual power within the sports world.

The main idea here is how sport as an institution shapes who holds power and in what way. The material shows that sport tends to reinforce heterosexual male power. This shows up in leadership and governance being dominated by men, the way media coverage and sponsorship priorities spotlight male athletes and masculine stories, and the cultural norms within sport that value toughness, competitiveness, and heterosexualized masculinity. Those patterns keep power concentrated with men and align with heterosexual norms, rather than leveling gender inequalities or shifting toward matriarchal structures.

So, it isn’t that sport eliminates disparities, has no impact, or promotes a matriarchal system—the patterns described point to reinforcing male-heterosexual power within the sports world.